Legal Opinion

United States v. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1986No. Nos. 433, 668 and 651, Docket 85-1178, 85-1205 and 85-1229PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Arthur Barr, Johnanne Winchester and Eliot Cohen challenge the evidentiary and constitutional bases for their convictions in this multi-defendant drug conspiracy case. Except for one issue Barr raises, these challenges are without merit and do not warrant discussion. Therefore, the judgments of conviction of appellants Winchester and Cohen are affirmed.

*21Barr, thé recognized “ring-leader” of the drug conspiracy, was arrested on June 1, 1984 and charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1982). When unable to post bail set…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Richard Willoughby, Quintin Prioleau, Arthur Prioleau, and Carleton MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. State of Texas v. Granville, AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. United States v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API