Cottle v. Hayes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant. ORCP 47. She argues that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to defendant’s liability for conversion and, therefore, summary judgment is precluded. We review the summary judgment record in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1979), and reverse.
Plaintiff alleges that she entered into an agreement with the Hayeses in October, 1990, under which the Hayeses agreed to board eight of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Naas v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Tulloch v. CockrumOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Kutbi v. Thunderlion Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McPhail v. Milwaukie Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Reynolds v. SchrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005