Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Virgin

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1990No. 73882Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BAILEY, Judge:

Petitioner Weyerhaeuser Company (Employer) seeks review of an order of the *1098Worker’s Compensation Court sitting en banc affirming the Trial Court’s award of benefits to Respondent Bobby Virgin (Claimant). Herein, -Employer asserts (1) error of the Trial Court in failing to make a specific finding of fact on Employer’s defense, and (2) lack of evidentiary support for the Trial Court’s finding of compensa-ble on-the-job injury.

Two of Claimant’s co-employees, Moran and Britt, apparently became embroiled in a “scuffle.” Claimant apparently attempted to “break up”…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Marland Refining Co. v. ColbaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API