Christian v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
Appellant appeals from a jury verdict which found him guilty of theft by deception. He contends the trial court erred when it (1) denied his motion for continuance, (2) restricted his cross-examination of the victim and a police officer, and (3) determined the evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction. Our study of the record reflects the trial court was correct in each instance, and therefore, we affirm.
I. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Appellant was charged jointly with co-defendant, James Guy, and they were to be tried together on January 7, 1982. However, Guy failed to appear on…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Finch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Drew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Nelke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Beck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.