Brown v. State

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellants were each charged and convicted of the manufacture of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1981).1 They raise six points for reversal, and we consider each in the order presented by appellants.

I. THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED.

In this argument, appellants rely heavily on the holding in Sanders v. State, 264 Ark. 433, 572 S.W.2d 397 (1978), a 4-3 Supreme Court decision. In sum, appellants argue both, or at least one of the two marijuana patches, discovered by law enforcement officers are entitled to…