Legal Opinion

Liebenstein v. Baltic Fire Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellant against appellee, in the court below, on a policy of insurance against loss or damage from fire, in the sum of $1,250. The cause was tried by the court, who found for the defendant, whereupon an appeal was taken to this court. The further facts in this case are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

The appellant, being engaged in the manufacture of chairs, effected an insurance with the appellee on property described in the policy as “ chair lumber, and such other stock as is usually used in a chair manufactory, contained in their chair factory, situated on Superior street, between Kingsbury and Boberts streets, Chicago, Illinois.” The establishment consisted of a main building, in which about thirty men were employed, and which also contained the machinery, and an engine house about twenty feet square, standing ten feet in the rear of the main building and connected with it by a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Bickford v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  4. Guthrie Laundry Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Carr v. Hibernia InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API