Guthrie Laundry Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford. Trial -Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
PaNCOAst, J.:
This was an action brought in the district court of Logan county by the Guthrie Laundry Company against the Northern Assurance Company, of London, to recover upon a policy of insurance, for loss by fire to property alleged to have been covered by such polic3r at the time of the fire. A stipulation in the policy as to the property covered is as follows:
“One thousand dollars on their two story basement and brick building, with metal roof, and its additions adjoining and communicating, including foundations, occupied as a steam laundry * *
The laundry was ití…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Pettit v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Rice v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
- Cargill v. Millers' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Gross v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shepard v. Germania Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Pearl Assur. Co., Limited v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. v. Pearl Assur. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Pearl Assur. Co. v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954