Legal Opinion

Guthrie Laundry Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford. Trial -Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

PaNCOAst, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Logan county by the Guthrie Laundry Company against the Northern Assurance Company, of London, to recover upon a policy of insurance, for loss by fire to property alleged to have been covered by such polic3r at the time of the fire. A stipulation in the policy as to the property covered is as follows:

“One thousand dollars on their two story basement and brick building, with metal roof, and its additions adjoining and communicating, including foundations, occupied as a steam laundry * *

The laundry was ití…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  2. Pettit v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Rice v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cargill v. Millers' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Gross v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. CastileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Shepard v. Germania Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pearl Assur. Co., Limited v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. v. Pearl Assur. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Pearl Assur. Co. v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API