Legal Opinion
Jordan v. City of Atlanta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 19, 2007No. A06A1690PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Judy Jordan and Ellen Wilburn, classified employees of the Department of Information and Technology of the City of Atlanta (the “City”), lost their jobs pursuant to a City reduction-in-force (“RIF”) ordinance, which Jordan and Wilburn claim was not properly followed. After the Service Board (the “Board”) denied their appeal of the RIF action, Jordan and Wilburn filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton County. The trial court thereafter dismissed the lawsuit, finding that “[Jordan and Wilburn] failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.”
On appeal, Jordan and Wilburn…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Precise v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- MacK II, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Brown v. State Merit System of Personnel AdministrationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Leake v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Cochran v. City of RockmartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Cumming v. FlowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Renz v. Northside Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Rozier v. Mayor of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- A. Thomas Jones v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- CITY OF CUMMING v. FLOWERSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017