Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 18, 1987No. Civ. A. 81-48 MMSPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Three motions in this hard fought litigation are the subject of this opinion. Defendant, The Coca-Cola Company (“Company”), requests that the Court amend its decision in Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Co., 654 F.Supp. 1388 (“Coke IIF’), establishing the meaning of the terms “sugar” and “market price” in the 1921 Consent Decrees. Plaintiff bottlers filed two motions, the first for summary judgment on the first-line bottlers’ standing to enforce the 1921 Consent Decrees, and the second requesting that the Court certify the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  3. Biovail Corp. International v. Hoechst AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling of Elizabethtown v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  5. Hodges Ex Rel. Hodges v. Public Building CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API