Legal Opinion
Koplik v. Arnott
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided October 26, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim is denied.
Plaintiff has brought this action to recover fees for dental treatment he allegedly provided to defendant. Defendant’s counterclaim, contained in the amended answer, alleges that plaintiff committed dental malpractice by improperly fitting defendant’s dentures so that she lost "supporting tooth structure” and suffered "serious periodontal problems” and "extreme mobility in her anterior teeth.” The counterclaim demands damages for pain and suffering and the cost of repairing the injuries caused…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- 219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Alteresko v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- People v. IfillNew York Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1988
- Safier & Vogelman v. KalvinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1991
- Safier & Vogelman v. KalvinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1991