Legal Opinion

Alteresko v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged malpractice on the part of the defendant, a dentist. It appears from the record that there was a space between two of plaintiff’s lower front teeth to the extent of about one-sixteenth of an inch. Believing that this condition was detrimental to her appearance, she called upon the defendant with a view to having it corrected. ITe informed her that, to accomplish what she desired, it would be necessary to remove the tops of the two teeth referred to and insert pivot teeth. That was done, but it was found that the pivot teeth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Robbins v. NathanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Blackburn v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Pickering v. FreedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. Koplik v. ArnottCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. Mendelson v. GinderCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API