Legal Opinion

United States v. Kunen

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 16, 2004No. 1:02-cv-00326PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are motions by Scott Kunen (“Kunen”), Paul Alexander (“Alexander”), Frank Bellavia (“Bellavia”), and George Stephens, (“Stephens”) to suppress child pornography seized upon the execution of search warrants at their respective homes. The grounds advanced by each defendant are essentially the same, viz., that information in the affidavit submitted in support of the application for the search warrant was either (a) known by the FBI agents involved to be false or (b) the product of the agents’ reckless disregard for the truth and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Robert H. Davis, United States of America v. George D. GelestinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Willie CoreasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. AliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. United States v. MandellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. Palmieri v. KammererDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API