Household Finance Corporation v. Walters
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This appeal raises the question of whether, following a borrower’s discharge in bankruptcy, a small loan company can recover the entire amount of a “renewal loan” made by it in reliance upon a false financial statement of the borrower, or whether recovery is limited to the amount of “new money” or “fresh cash” advanced by the loan company at the time the false statement is made.
Clarity will be served by immediate reference to the applicable law.
Prior to 1960, Section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 35, entitled “Debts not affected by a discharge,” provided, in pertinent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Household Finance Corp. v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Charleston v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- First Credit Corp. v. WellnitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. CooperConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Household Finance Corp. v. DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- First American National Bank v. Carter (In Re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
- Superior Loan Corporation of Buffalo v. RobieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Kaliff (In Re Kaliff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.