Legal Opinion

Rios v. Marshall

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 12, 1983No. 79 Civ. 5711PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GAGLIARDI, District Judge.

This action was commenced by thirty-eight United States citizen migrant farm-workers, who allege that seven New York apple growers, two New York apple growers’ cooperatives (collectively referred to as the “New York apple defendants”), and their agents, including two Florida sugar cane growers’ associations (collectively referred to as the “Florida sugar defendants”), conspired to replace plaintiffs in the New York apple harvest with temporary foreign workers from Jamaica.1 Named as defendants in addition to the New York apple defendants and the Florida sugar…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. In re Workers' CompensationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  5. Haywood v. BarnesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API