Woodall v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Where it is stipulated in a policy of fire-insurance that no action thereon shall be sustainable against the insurance company unless commenced within twelve months next after the occurrence of the loss, an action brought after the lapse of that period is barred, although the petition shows that the suit is a renewal of a previous action which wás commenced within the time limited, and that the second suit was brought within six months after the first one was nonsuited. Melson v. Phenix Insurance Co., 97 Ga. 722.(a) Such a petition should be dismissed on general demurrer. The ruling in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Melson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Smith v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reece v. Massachusetts Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Aiken v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Yates v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Peeples v. Western Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.