Legal Opinion
State v. Norris
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2007No. 20041118PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
1 1 Defendant Richard Norris seeks reversal of the court of appeals' ruling that Utah Code section 76-10-1801 is neither unconstitutionally overbroad nor vague.
T2 Norris also asks that we reverse the court of appeals' decision that proper jurisdiction existed in the district court for the filing of charges against him even though the remittitur of his pending appeal was issued prematurely. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
13 Norris ran advertisements in local newspapers for salaried employment positions. The employment consisted of selling a diet product or some type of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Grand County v. Emery CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Salt Lake County v. Metro West Ready Mix, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- I.M.L. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. BlackUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Salt Lake City v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. MattinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.