Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion [752] to Compel Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton to Provide Appropri- ’ ate Responses to Plaintiffs’ Second Requests for Production of Documents. Upon consideration of this motion, and the opposition and reply thereto, the court will GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART plaintiffs’ motion, as discussed and ordered below.
I. Background
The underlying allegations in this case arise from what has become popularly known as “Filegate.” Plaintiffs allege that their privacy interests were violated when the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Tavoulareas v. PiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Calzaturficio S.C.A.R.P.A. S.P.A. V. Fabiano Shoe Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Enron Corp. Savings Plan v. Hewitt Associates, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.