KERDPOKA v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
Yotthachai Kerdpoka was convicted of child molestation, and he appeals. He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Rather, he challenges rulings of the trial court regarding voir dire, the admission of character evidence, the scope of cross-examination, and prejudicial remarks by a juror; he also contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
Construed in favor of the verdict, the evidence shows that Phil and Phoebe Hughes employed a Thai housekeeper named Nitaya Meebamroong for 14 years. Meebamroong’s son — the appellant — came to the United States in 1999…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Kolokouris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bunnell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- The State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Reginald Priddy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- Timothy Ransom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012