Legal Opinion

Anderson v. De Urioste

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1892No. 14717PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

— This is an action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment upon a lot on Oak Street, in the city of San Francisco. The assessment was for the con*405struction of a brick sewer with man-holes on Oak Street, from the westerly line of Cole Street to Baker Street, and the complaint alleges that all the proceedings leading up to the assessment were duly had and taken under and in pursuance of an act of the legislature entitled “ An act to provide for work upon streets, lanes, alleys, courts, places, and sidewalks, and for the construction of sewers within municipalities,” approved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutting Packing Co. v. Packers' ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ede v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gillis v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Robinson v. RispinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. In Re Idearc Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Wiseman v. SklarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API