Legal Opinion

Alamo Development Corp. v. Thomas

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1948PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

Harry A. Thomas, a resident of Crockett County, Tennessee, died intestate on January 7, 1947. On January 29, 1947, the appellant, was appointed • and qualified as his administratrix. On the same day "she had notices *633published to creditors pursuant to the then appíicablé statutory requirements as shown by section one of Chapter 175 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1939, carried in the Code of Tennessee as section 8196.1. This notice provided that all creditors of the estate “file the same with the Clerk of the above named Court within one year from the date of the first publication of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hathaway v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Commerce Union Bank v. GillespieTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Milbourne v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. West Feliciana Railroad v. StockettMississippi Supreme Court · 1850

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bowden v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re: Estate of Martha M. TannerTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Wimley v. RudolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wunderlich v. FortasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API