Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Veenstra

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 187319PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a jury verdict of no cause of action in favor of defendant. We reverse and remand.

As a fourteen-year-old, defendant Aaron Veenstra took a driver’s education course offered through the Calumet Public School system. Veenstra had skipped four grades in elementary school and graduated from high school early. He was taking driver’s education so that he would have transportation to college. Before the driver’s education course, Veenstra had never driven an automobile on a public road in a developed area. On the first day of the driving portion of the class,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Luidens v. 63rd District CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. MartinezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Chastain v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Freed v. SalasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Jackson v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Clark v. K-Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API