Legal Opinion

Luidens v. 63rd District Court

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1996No. Docket 165935, 167662PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

In Docket No. 165935, plaintiff appeals as of right the judgment for defendant rendered following a 1993 jury trial. In Docket No. 167662, defendant 63rd District Court appeals as of right the circuit court’s order denying its motion for attorney fees and denying a portion of its requested taxable costs. We affirm the judgment but remand with respect to the order regarding taxable costs and attorney fees.

The present matter arises out of an age discrimination claim relating to defendant’s termination of plain tiff’s employment as chief probation officer. Plaintiff was sixty-three years old at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wilson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. GIANNETTI BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Sanders v. Monical MacHinery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Derderian v. Genesys Health Care SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. AFP Specialties, Inc. v. VereykenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Hanley v. Mazda Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Harbour v. Correctional Medical Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life FellowshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API