Legal Opinion

Watson v. Stockton Morris Plan Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1939No. Civ. 6009; Civ. 6030PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On rehearing, which was granted for the reason that both parties petitioned for it, we have again carefully examined the entire record. We are persuaded that the original opinion of this court correctly determines the issues presented, and we therefore adopt that opinion in toto.

The appellant, Stanley E. Watson, strenuously contends that both the trial court and this court erred in determining that he did not acquire title to the entire savings account involved in this litigation by virtue of his sale of that account as a pledge under the provisions of section 3000 et seq. of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Goldberg v. ListCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan Association, in Re James H. Emery in Re Cheryl A. Emery, Debtors, Kasdan, Simonds, McIntyre Epstein & Martin v. World Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API