Bates v. ROOT-LOWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment.
On September 26, 1957, plaintiff sustained injury while using defendant’s product. An action instituted to recover the consequent damage yielded a verdict for plaintiff. The only question here is whether this result is sustained by the evidence.
Defendant, Root-Lowell Manufacturing Company, manufactured and placed in the channels of commerce a bug sprayer described in this way:
“* * * It is of a common design whereby an airtight plunger is pushed and pulled through a tube closed at one end except for a pinhole. The alternating changes in air pressure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.