Legal Opinion

Edstrom v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1986No. C8-85-881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Norman Alvin Edstrom, who is serving a 30-year sentence imposed in 1975 for rape, seeks habeas corpus. It appears that the Federal District Court dismissed Edstrom’s petition for habeas corpus because of failure to exhaust state remedies. Edstrom then filed a petition in state district court. The Minnesota Court of Appeals, 378 N.W.2d 90, affirmed the order of the district court denying relief. Specifically, the Court of Appeals held (1) that petitioner— who is serving a pre-Guidelines sentence that he was unable to get reduced in a postconviction relief proceeding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Case v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Edstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Edstrom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northwest v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Taylor v. LieffortCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Case v. PungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API