Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Collection Service Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1932No. 41307PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Appellants conduct a collection agency in the city of Cedar Rapids. Appellee is a widow living with her two children, a son of sixteen and a daughter of eighteen. She was employed in a dry goods store in Cedar Rapids as a clerk and saleslady. The appellants knew that she was a widow living with said children, and that the wages which she earned were exempt to her. She became indebted to a coal company in the sum of $28.75. The appellants had said claim for collection, and in attempting to collect the same wrote a series of letters to the appellee. It is unnecessary that we set out the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Gadbury v. BleitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. RochCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Whitsel v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. May v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Wagenmann v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API