Legal Opinion

Whitsel v. Watts

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,069PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Bourbon district court; Charles E. Hulett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Carrie Whitsel recovered a judgment against D. M. Watts for $225 as damages for injuries which he is alleged to have willfully and maliciously inflicted upon her. Defendant appeals and insists that the evidence did not warrant the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court and that several rulings made during the trial were erroneous.

It appears that defendant held a mortgage on some hogs belonging to the plaintiff’s husband and that accompanied by a constable he visited the plaintiff’s home when her husband was absent and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Lonergan v. William Small & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Shelton v. BorntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Gomez v. HugCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API