Legal Opinion

Worker's Compensation Claim of Hamilton v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2001No. 00-91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶1] The primary issue in this appeal is whether a worker compensation claimant's inconsistent reports of the cause of her injury entitle a hearing examiner to determine an injury is not work-related. We affirm the hearing examiner's decision.

ISSUES

[T2] Appellant Naney L. Hamilton presents this single issue for our review:

Did the Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) act arbitrarily, capriciously, or otherwise unlawfully in the meaning of the Wyoming workers' compensation law and contrary to substantial evidence when it entered, on December 30, 1999, a final order,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Bruns v. TW Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Claim of Beall v. Sky Blue Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Matter of Worker's Compensation Claim of Watkins v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Medical CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Watkins v. STATE EX REL. WYO. MED. COM'NWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Camilleri v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY AND COMP. DIV.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API