Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Grossman
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 2, 1925No. 24PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
This is an original petition in this Court for a writ of habeas corpus by Philip Grossman against Ritchie V. Graham, Superintendent of the Chicago House of Correction, Cook County, Illinois. The respondent has answered the rule to show cause. The facts are not in dispute.
On November 24, 1920, the United States filed a bill in equity against Philip Grossman in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, under Section 22 of the National Prohibition Act (Ch. 85, 41 Stat. 305, 314), averring that Grossman was maintaining a nuisance at his place of business in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.