Legal Opinion

Mekulich v. Liddycoat

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action for ejectment. Plaintiff also seeks recovery of treble damages under ORS 105.810 and punitive damages. The trial court granted plaintiff’s prayer for ejectment and awarded double damages. Defendants appeal the ejectment decision and plaintiff cross-appeals the decision awarding double damages instead of treble damages.

In 1965 plaintiff purchased Lot 7 and a part of Lot 6, in the Laurelhurst residential section of the City of Portland. In 1969 defendants purchased a parcel of land consisting of Lot 5 and a part of Lot 6. Plaintiff’s and defendants’ land would be contiguous…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Chapman v. DeanOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mascall v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. ReussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Liddycoat v. UlbrichtOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Agrons v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Miller v. Transamerica Title InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Pallies v. DurandOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API