Legal Opinion

Hungerford v. Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — George Jepson, Judge. Action at law, to recover upon a policy of life insurance issued by tbe defendant upon the life of Willard L. Hungerford. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

*8531. Iítsubaitce: prohibited occupotion, vamp, *852— On March 23, 1917, Willard L. Hungerford, residing in the town of Slayton, Minnesota, was and for some *853time had been employed as engineer of an electric light plant at that place. On the date named, said Hunger- „ , . , ,. j. n ford signed an application for life insurance in the defendant company. The application was received and approved by the defendant, and a policy issued thereon for the sum of $1,000, payable to the plaintiff, Lillian B. Hungerford. The insured man died on November 24, 1917, and due notice and proofs thereof were delivered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Dailey v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Schwindermann v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API