O'Sullivan v. Nynex Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
The plaintiffs, Kenneth O’Sullivan and other NYNEX customers (plaintiffs), appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them in favor of the defendant, NYNEX Corporation (NYNEX), on a claim that NYNEX violated G. L. c. 272, § 99 (wiretap statute). We transferred the appeal to this court on our own motion. The plaintiffs argue that the motion judge erred in determining that NYNEX’s secret monitoring and recording of calls from NYNEX telemarketers to customers fell within the “telephone equipment” and “common carrier” *262exceptions set forth in G. L. c. 272, § 99. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Vasys v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- United States v. Richard Kay HarpelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- James v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schmerling v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HydeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Dillon v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. MoodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- United States v. SawyerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.