Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Bennion

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1978No. 11925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This controversy stems from the unusual manner in which an access road was depicted on the plat of a subdivision of lakeshore property at Windy Bay on Lake Coeur d’Alene. In 1962, defendants Bennions, the original owners of the property, caused the plat to be made, dedicated and recorded under the name “Second Addition to Ben-point.” The filed plat shows what to the casual observer would appear to be a “platted” roadway. No other roadway of any kind is indicated or depicted on the plat which sets forth the owners’ certificate, stating: “We dedicate the roads herein as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cassell v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Smylie v. PearsallIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lisher v. KrasseltIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. McDaniel v. MaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Boucher v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Middlekauff v. Lake Cascade, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Saddlehorn Ranch Landowner's, Inc. v. DyerIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sun Valley Land & Minerals, Inc. v. HawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API