Legal Opinion

Glover v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1992No. WD 45815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Chief Judge.

This appeal is taken by the plaintiff, Glover, from the granting of motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) in favor of the defendant employer, the railway, in a Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) action. 45 U.S.C. § 51 (1986).

The evidence showed Glover, a carmen welder hurt his back while lifting a metal plate along with another Santa Fe employee. A jury returned a $75,000 verdict. In sustaining the j.n.o.v. motion the court noted an absence of negligence as required under the federal act.

The plaintiff and Romero were going to install a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Euton v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. White v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Crawford v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Harper v. Business Men's Assurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API