Lacewell v. Griffin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddiN, Justice.
This appeal stems from a collision between a bus owned by appellees and a truck owned by appellant, and presents for decision questions which arise because of provisions found in Act 315 of 1941, known as the “Uniform Contribution Among Tort-feasors Act.” We identify the parties: Appellees Griffin and Roberson are partners, doing business under the name of Cowen Bus Line, and are engaged as a motor carrier of passengers. Appellee Lewis was the driver of the Cowen bus involved in the collision. We will hereinafter refer to all the appellees as “Cowen.” Appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petillo v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Shultz v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Brotman v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Ward v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. SpaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Rio Grande Gas Company v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Giem v. Williams, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Schott v. Colonial Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.