Legal Opinion

Giem v. Williams, Administratrix

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1949No. 4-8937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is an action instituted hy appellee, as widow and administratrix, to recover damages for the death of Joe Williams.

Giem and Associates, hereinafter called appellants, obtained a contract to construct a dormitory on the campus of the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville. Appellants sublet the excavation work to Carl Tune. Joe Williams (hereinafter called deceased) went to the place of construction to apply to appellants’ superintendent for work as a carpenter. While in appellants’ shed on the premises, Williams was struck on the head by a large rock which had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Shultz v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. McConnon v. Charles H. Hodgate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. The Hammond Ranch Corporation v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Cary Bros. & Hannon v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Woodard v. HollidaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Arkansas Kraft Corporation v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Schott v. Colonial Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API