Legal Opinion

Casco Castle Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 30, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

The bill of exceptions which brings-the proceedings here under consideration to this Court was allowed by the chairman of the Public Utilities Commission on August 26,1944, pursuant to the provisions of R. S. 1930, Chap. 62, Sec. 63, as amended, now found in R. S. 1944, Chap. 40, Sec. 66.

*224The petition which instituted the process is dated May 24, 1944, and was filed with the Commission in accordance with Chapter 155 of the Public Laws of 1933 (R. S. 1944, Chap. 40, Sec. 47) to secure approval for discontinuance of the service then being rendered to the public by the petitioner. It was denied…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Telephone Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Public Utilities Commission v. Cole's ExpressSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API