Legal Opinion

State v. Hutchinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1990No. 16952PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

The State appeals 1 a trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The order suppressed “all objects seized at the scene of the arrest” 2 of defendant by Jack McMullin, a member of the Missouri Highway Patrol.

The State’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence seized by the officer, “pursuant to the arrest of the defendant, which was precipitated by a lawful search for personal safety during a traffic stop because the trooper’s actions fell within those categories of searches which fall outside constitutional…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TackettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. BuchliMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. LeavittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. KovachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. MiddletonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API