Legal Opinion

Hook v. Baker

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 29, 2004No. 2:02-cv-00901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FROST, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Class Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment Liability Only (Doc. # 51); Memorandum Contra of the Defendant, Del Baker, dba Del’s Auto Sales, to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment Liability Only (Doc. # 53); and, Class Plaintiffs Reply to Defendant’s Memorandum In Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 55). The Court finds the plaintiffs motion (doc., # 51) to be well-taken and the Court GRANTS the same.

Defendant’s Amended Memorandum Contra to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 59)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kellena Cornist and David Jones v. B.J.T. Auto Sales, Inc. B.J.T. Finance, Inc. James Hadley Bill R. Hatcher Thomas TepeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Compton v. Altavista Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. North Shore Auto Financing, Inc. v. BlockOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Warford v. Memphis City Employees Credit UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. Webb Ford, Inc. v. Indiana Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API