Legal Opinion
Petition of Hoyt
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 21, 1999No. Nos. 97-783; 97-785PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The petitioners, Floyd W. Hoyt, N.D., and Carole E. Robinson, N.D., challenge the decision of the New Hampshire Board of Naturopathic Examiners (board), see RSA 328-E:7, :8 (1995 & Supp. 1998), denying their applications for licensure. See RSA 328-E:9 (1995). We reverse and remand.
The petitioners, both 1995 graduates of the National College of Naturopathic Medicine (National College), applied to the board for a license allowing them to practice naturopathic medicine in New Hampshire. The board denied both applications because the petitioners did not provide the board with documentation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Olson v. Town of FitzwilliamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Nathan L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- In re Baby Girl P.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Appeal of MaysSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Town of Nelson v. New Hampshire Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. ClydeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.