Legal Opinion

Seidel v. Great Factory Store

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1981No. 1500PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from the dismissal of a complaint, pursuant to authority contained in Montgomery County Rule of Civil Procedure 302(d), for failure to file a timely brief in response to preliminary objections and from a subsequent refusal by the court to vacate the earlier order. For reasons hereinafter appearing, we reverse the later order and remand for further proceedings.

On December 14, 1979, the appellant, Pat Seidel, caused a five count complaint to be filed against the appellee, Great Factory Store. On February 19,1980, appellee filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Jesray Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. St. Joe Paper Co. v. Marc Box Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Dupree v. LEE, MDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Horan v. R. S. Cook & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hesselgesser v. Glen-Craft Contractors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Alston v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Dream Pools of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. BaehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Wills Equipment Co. v. Goldman Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API