Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Evans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1991No. 906SC37PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The University of North Carolina assigns as error the trial court’s ruling that decedent’s certificates of deposit were among property that was not specifically devised. The trial court’s ruling resulted in the certificates of deposit passing by intestate succession rather than passing to the University under the will. The issue here is whether the term “remaining cash and bonds” in Item V of the will includes decedent’s certificates of deposit. We hold that “remaining cash and bonds” includes certificates of deposit.

While, as might be anticipated, the cases are not always…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Wing v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Pittman v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmundson v. MortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hollowell v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Scott v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Barnes v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API