Edmundson v. Morton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
This appeal presents the sole question of whether the trial court properly interpreted the effect of Item Five of the will on *256the distribution of the assets of the estate. The appealing defendants in this case are beneficiaries under the residual disposition clause in Julian Wilson’s will, who would stand to benefit from a different interpretation of the provisions of Item Five. The ap-pellee defendants are those who stand to benefit from the trial court’s interpretation. We remand this action for modification of the declaratory judgment entered.
The trial court concluded that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Matter of Estate of WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Tighe v. MichalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Barnes v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. SternCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996