Legal Opinion
Lehmann v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 7, 1996No. 95-C-332PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CURRAN, District Judge.
Diane R. Lehmann commenced this action pursuant to Section 602(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), which permits participants or beneficiaries of employee benefit plans to bring civil actions to recover benefits due them under the terms of the plan. Before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, admissions, affidavits and other materials show “that there is no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Christine M. Donato v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corp. Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- O'Connor v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Perlman v. SWISS BANK CORP. COMP. DISABILITY PROTECTION PLANDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997