STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP. v. Varner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Employer seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant’s stress-related mental condition is compensable. We affirm.
Claimant began to experience symptoms of stress after he was disciplined in his employment and demoted. Employer relies on Elwood v. SAIF, 298 Or 429, 693 P2d 641 (1985), to support its argument that stress which arises out of legitimate and fairly imposed discipline should not be compensable as a matter of law. The Supreme Court held that the legislature did not intend to make illness from losing a job a compensable risk of the job. 298…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Bales v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Elwood v. State Accident InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Columbia River Dairy v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006