Legal Opinion

STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP. v. Varner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1988No. WCB 85-12134; CA A42724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Employer seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant’s stress-related mental condition is compensable. We affirm.

Claimant began to experience symptoms of stress after he was disciplined in his employment and demoted. Employer relies on Elwood v. SAIF, 298 Or 429, 693 P2d 641 (1985), to support its argument that stress which arises out of legitimate and fairly imposed discipline should not be compensable as a matter of law. The Supreme Court held that the legislature did not intend to make illness from losing a job a compensable risk of the job. 298…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bales v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Elwood v. State Accident InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Columbia River Dairy v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API