Dowling v. Atlanta City School District
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff Dowling, an employee fired by defendants (collectively referred to herein as “the Board”) without a pretermination hearing, brought this action pursuant to the Fair Dismissal Act of Georgia (OCGA § 20-2-940 et seq.) as well as the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 USCA §§ 1983 and 1988. Although the trial court ruled that plaintiff was not covered by the Fair Dismissal Act, it eventually found that the Board had improperly fired plaintiff without good cause and ordered the Board to reinstate plaintiff with full back pay. Citing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlanta City School District v. DowlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Dowling v. Atlanta City School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Moon v. Terrell CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003