Legal Opinion
Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Blair
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 30, 1932No. 4617PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Various retail coal merchants in Paris, Hlinois, and other nearby towns filed a complaint with the Interstate Commerce Commission attacking, as unreasonable, the transportation rates on bituminous coal from Terre Haute and West Terre Haute, Indiana, to Paris and adjoining spots in Illinois. They also asked that the Commission make an award in the nature of reparation to them in respect of charges assessed during the period of two years prior to the filing of their complaint. Upon appellants’ filing a general denial, hearings were had which resulted in findings that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pittsburgh & W. v. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
- Lehigh Valley R. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Ry. of Alabama v. Montgomery CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Black United Front v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Bullock v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1937
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Fresnillo Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- The Black United Front v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia and Bruce J. Terris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970