Legal Opinion
State v. Evans
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1992No. 90-1452PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Per curiam
I
Appellant alleges in his first proposition of law that the prosecution engaged in misconduct in the guilt and mitigation phases of the trial.
A
Appellant challenges the following comments by the prosecutor during his closing argument in the mitigation phase:
“MR. HUDSON: * * * What do you think life imprisonment means? Twelve years later he’s out. And inside of three months, he had killed two more people. And they come here and say give us mercy. Life imprisonment?
“Mr. Saferin stands up here and talks to you about years and totals. I could tell you three or four different ways that that’s not a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.