Legal Opinion
Lind v. O'Connell (In Re Lind)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 31, 1998No. 19-30245PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Chief Judge.
This adversary proceeding was commenced by the plaintiff/debtor to avoid an alleged preferential transfer under bankruptcy code §§ 522(g) and (h) and 547(b), and to recover and exempt funds under §§ 550, 522(i) and 522(b). The plaintiff filed the instant motion for summary judgment which is denied for the reasons that follow.
BACKGROUND
On April 3, 1995, the plaintiff commenced this chapter 7 case. On November 29, 1996, she commenced this adversary proceeding to avoid two alleged preferential transfers and to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re AltmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Calandrelli Capasso v. Midland Funding LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2020