Legal Opinion
In Re Altman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1999No. 19-20189PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALAN H. W. SHIFF, Chief Judge.
Creditors Rafael Galleries, Inc. and Benjamin Aryeh (collectively “Rafael”) allege that a painting by Richard E. Miller known as “Women at Tea: Giverny” (the “Painting”) is property of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. The controversy here arises under the debt- or’s objection to Rafael’s proof of claim and Rafael’s motion for the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee. See Rule 3007, F.R. Bankr.P.; 11 U.S.C. §§ 502,1104.
The court first considers whether the Painting is property of the debtor’s estate. If so, or if other circumstances warrant, see…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tradex Corp. v. MorseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership v. Keeley (In Re Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Carroll v. Rafael Galleries, Inc. (In Re Altman)District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- United Statesha Soha Terrace, LLC. v. RGS Holding, LLC (In re Futterman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
- Nisselson v. Carroll (In Re Altman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.